Down’s syndrome is a genetic condition involving an extra chromosome,
has forty-seven chromosomes instead of the usual forty-six. A relatively
common genetic disorder, Down’s strikes 1 out of 600 babies. In 95 percent of
all cases, the disorder originates with the egg, not the sperm, and the only
People with Down’s syndrome all have a certain degree of learning
many will read and write, go to ordinary school, and look forward to a semi-
independent adult life. (Platt and Carlson, 1992)
Facts on Down Syndrome
*Down syndrome is not a lethal anomaly. One to two percent of persons
life expectancy for all others is now beyond age 55 years.
mental retardation, and some are exhibiting normal IQ scores today.
with many reading at 6th-12th grade levels today.
*The vast majority of adults with Down syndrome today can be expected to
live semi- or totally independently and many enter the work force with today’s
Down syndrome include:
*Congenital Heart Disease: usually in the form of endocardial cushion
defects, affects 40% of babies and should be screened for by echocardiography
soon after birth as it may well be difficult to detect.
* Gastrointestinal disorders: the most common congenital abnormality of
the gastrointestinal tract associated with Down syndrome is duodenal atresia,
although pyloric stenosis, Hirschsprung’s disease and tracheo-oesophageal
fistulae have all been reported.
* Vision: Three percent of newborns with Down syndrome will have dense
* Congenital Hypothyroidism: This condition is slightly more prevalent
in babies with Down syndrome. It should be detected by the routine heelprick
screen performed on all babies.
*Congenital dislocation of the hips: Joint laxity and hypotonia can
combine to increase the incidence of hip dislocation, although true congenital
dislocation is quite rare.
* Sensory deficits: Significant hearing impairments occur in the
majority of children with Down syndrome. Annual audiometry and specialist
consultation is recommended.
* Atlantoaxial instability: Up to 15% of children with Down syndrome
will have evidence of instability of the atlantoaxial joint but in only a
handful of cases will this instability result in an impingement on the spinal
cord with resultant neurological signs.
* Physical growth: Physical development is invariably delayed in
children with Down syndrome. A tendency towards obesity requires special
* Dental care: The teeth of children with Down syndrome tend to be small,
irregularly spaced and misshapen. Early and frequent dental care is required to
ensure adequate dentition for adult life.
*Dementia: Much recent attention has been focused on the association
of developing Alzheimer’s disease. (Newton, 1992)
A significant amount of research has been conducted on Down syndrome, in
particular many methods to detect Down syndrome in fetuses have been developed.
syndrome children and adults. The following is a discussion of some of the
detection methods for Down syndrome, and the facilities in which they were
Scientists at Norfolk’s Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine say
they have overcome most technical hurdles to screening embryos for Down syndrome
and many other chromosomal defects before the embryos are implanted in a woman’s
the technique with a handful of high-risk couples who come to the institute for
Eventually, all couples who go through the Jones Institute may have the
option to screen for Down and most of the other conditions caused by an extra
chromosome on one of 23 pairs that make up the normal complement. The technique
Down. (www #1)
According to Kingsley and Levitz (1994), in-vitro fertilization (IVF),
is a technique in which eggs are removed from a woman’s ovaries and combined
with sperm in a dish. The resulting embryos are transplanted into the woman’s
uterus. Before transplant, a single cell will be removed and exposed to probes
made up of genetic material treated with fluorescent dye. Each probe has been
designed to attach to a specific chromosome in the nucleus. Using a special
microscope, a scientist can count the dots of various colors. Three of a
The institute will test five pairs that account for most chromosomal
defects. The first cases will be done for free. When the procedure becomes
common, the procedure will add about $2,000 to the cost of IVF, about $7,500.
The Chairman of reproductive endocrinology at the Jones Institute said the
procedure was developed primarily to avoid the multiple births that sometimes
happen with IVF. (www #1)
Most transplanted embryos, and many naturally conceived ones, never take
root and grow because they have the wrong number of chromosomes. In IVF, doctors
try to improve the odds by implanting three or more, assuming that some will be
lost. But sometimes, many or all of the embryos are viable. The parents then
must decide – do they selectively abort some, or do they take on the hugely
demanding task of having many babies at once? If doctors could screen the
embryos, he said, they could limit themselves to implanting two and still enjoy
a high probability that the embryos will survive.
Nevertheless, the ability to screen out embryos with Down syndrome still
worries families of people with the condition. (www #1)
The option not to have a child with Down already exists. Tests during
pregnancy can detect the condition. Parents may choose an abortion. Parents of
children with Down syndrome, say that other parents who choose to discard an
embryo in a laboratory are further removed from the implications of their
decision. Doctors at the medical center say that they want very much for people
confronting the decision to understand that having a child with Down syndrome
can be very fulfilling. They says the Jones Institute isn’t trying to devalue
people with Down syndrome by offering the test. But they say this information
would give it to them and they make the choice.
Polar Body Analysis
Physicians at Illinois Masonic Medical center have discovered that they
can determine if a woman will have a baby with Down’s syndrome before she gets
pregnant, provided she is willing to undergo in-vitro fertilization. Using an
egg can be checked before laboratory fertilization, helping some women avoid
Chicago researchers at Masonic reported on a yearlong study involving
100 women who underwent the polar body procedure, they say that several women
already have delivered healthy babies, and more than 20 are pregnant with no
sign of Down’s.
But the possibility exists that the Masonic patients could have achieved
the same results without genetic testing. The majority of women who have
conventional in-vitro fertilization are older and have normal pregnancies. Dr.
body work gives a 35-year-old female the same chance of conceiving a
chromosomally normal baby that a 21-year-old has. He said at least half the
women in the in-vitro fertilization program are 35 or older. (www #2)
Polar body analysis hinges on basic biology. During normal development,
the human egg contains a sac of excess chromosomes called the polar body before
it gets ready to be fertilized by a male’s sperm. Since this sac, is a mirror
image of the egg, the genetic content of the egg itself can be determined
through this procedure. (www #3)
Without such testing, about 30 percent of the Down’s pregnancies
resulting from in-vitro fertilization would have miscarried naturally, and
others could have been picked up by the standard prenatal testing techniques,
chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis.
In-vitro fertilization is expensive, labor intensive and often
disappointing. The polar body test would add another $2,000 to $2,500 to its
costs. (www #2)
The Triple Screen
The “triple screen for Down syndrome” has been in existence for over
and Gynecologists officially recommended that this test be offered to all
pregnant patients of all ages. This implies a legal mandate to practicing
physicians who cannot afford the liability of not offering such a test after a
national recommendation has been made. This “mandate” has been met with great
controversy. (www #3)
The “triple screen” actually involves drawing maternal blood to test for
serum levels of three hormones: human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG),
alphafetoprotein (AFP), and estriol (E3). The pattern of the levels of these
hormones predicts the presence of Down syndrome in the fetuses in up to 60-70%
of pregnancies affected. By using computer formulas, the hormonal levels can be
found that are predictive for a risk of Down syndrome in the fetus that
approximates 1 in 190 – which is the same risk that a pregnant woman has at age
35. Thus, the test has been recommended now for women at all ages. If it is
“positive”, it should be followed by ultrasonography and then amniocentesis to
make a definitive diagnosis. (www #3)
Some uses of the triple screen are seen as positive by all. If the test
is negative, these results can prevent further unnecessary ultrasonography, or
amniocentesis, or chorionic villus sampling – for women 35 or over; or for the
woman with a previous fetus with Down syndrome. Normally these more expensive
and invasive tests would have been recommended in those settings.
It is the use of the test for all pregnant women that begins to stir
controversy. Only one such serum test has ever been recommended so widely before
- the serum (AFP) alphafetoprotein screen. It is a screening test for multiple
types of fetal defects that affect the “neural tube” in the fetus. These defects
include such problems as anencephaly, holoprosencephaly, or einencephaly, as
well as many levels of spina bifida. Down syndrome is certainly not the same as
the wide range of anomalies termed “neural tube defects,” but the Triple Screen
makes it seem an equal to many lethal defects.
The triple screen actually detects many more fetal anomalies than Down
syndrome, including the AFP-related anomalies mentioned above and several lethal
trisomies, such as Trisomy 18. The Triple Screen is called a screen “for Down
The Triple Screen is, in fact, a very poor screen, identifying only
about 65% of fetuses with Down syndrome in utero. No other screen with such low
validity has been universally recommended for all pregnant women. Such a
recommendation means billions of dollars for the genetics industry and the
researchers involved. (www #3)
The screening tests establish the probability of pregnant women having
children with Down Syndrome or Spina Bifida and other neural tube defects. It is
identification and abortion of fetuses with Down Syndrome may adversely affect
the quality of life for all persons with Down Syndrome in the community.
Many groups representing people with Down syndrome have expressed their
feelings about this issue, the following is a summary of some of the wishes they
1. The primary goal of prenatal genetic testing should not be to reduce
the birth prevalence of Down Syndrome in the population. Its use should be
directed towards the provision of improved health care. 2.Prenatal genetic
testing should be voluntary. The woman or couple should receive counseling
that is comprehensive and provided in a language that is easily understood
by them. Prior to reviewing written consent for prenatal testing, the couple
should be given accurate and up-to-date information on all relevant issues
surrounding prenatal genetic testing and Down Syndrome. This information
should be provided in a balanced manner. Each woman or couple should
be allowed to decide whether prenatal genetic testing is appropriate for
them based on informed choice. An appropriate period of time should be
allowed between receiving information and deciding, with written
consent whether or not to proceed with the test. 3. Following a test result
which implies that the fetus may have a probability of a chromosone
abnormality such as Down Syndrome, the woman or couple should be
provided with detailed, balanced information regarding the options
available to them. This information should be provided by a
in accredited genetic centres. Balanced information should be so
recorded for the woman or couple to review at their leisure.
Opportunities to have the woman or couple speak to parents of
children with Down Syndrome should be offered. (www #4)
It is evident that the debate over screening for Down syndrome is far
from settled. It is also evident that people with Down syndrome can make an
important contribution to our society. I think if parents are not prepared to
take on the challenges of a child with Down syndrome they should have options,
should one of these options be abortion?
I would have a hard time supporting someone’s decision to abort, especially
having spent some time with a young boy who has Down syndrome.
There are many support groups for families who have children with Down
syndrome, there are also many families willing to adopt. The programs at school
for these children are very adaptable to the needs of the individual. Most
children with Down syndrome can go to school and get along well, they make a
valuable contribution to the classroom and their fellow students. The decision
is a difficult one and I think that there are many options that need to be
explored before anyone can make an informed decision.
Cooley, W. and Graham, J. (1991). Down syndrome – an update and review for the
primary paediatrician. Clin Paed 30 (4): 233-253.
Graves, P. (1990). The intellectually disabled child in Robinson MJ practical
paediatrics 2nd ed. Melboune: Churchill Livingstone.
Kingsley, J. and Levitz, M. (1994). Count us in: Growing up with down syndrome.
New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Newton, R.(1992). Down’s syndrome. London: Optima.
Platt, L. and Carlson, D.(1992). Prenatal diagnosis – when and how? NEJM 327
Pueschel, S.(1990). Clinical aspects of down syndrome from infancy to
adulthood. Am J Med Gen Supp 7: 52-56
Pueschel, S. and Pueschel, J. (Eds) (1992). Biomedical concerns in persons with
down syndrome. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Co.
asymptomatic individuals with Down syndrome. Paediatrics 89 (6) pg. 1194-
Selikowitz, M.(1990). Down Syndrome – the facts. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Stray-Gundersen, K. (Ed.) (1995). Babies with down syndrome: A new parents’
guide (2nd edition). Rockville, MD: Woodbine House.
Tingey, C. (Ed.) (1988). Down syndrome: A resource handbook. Boston, MA:
College- Hill Press.
www #1. http://www.erms.edu/jones/depthome.htm
www #2. http://ptolemy.eess.edu/ds.html
www #3. http://wwwpino/ds/prenata/nsdcapf.html