This paper explores whether the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) is higher among low income people because they are less likely to seek medical care. It investigates two urban districts that compare in terms of race and income level, these being Harlem and West Central, USA. To determine the role of race and economic disadvantage in the incidence of tuberculosis in these geographic areas, ethnographic methods were used to analyze the information. It appears that there are significant race and class dimensions to the incidence of tuberculosis in these areas, but there are other confounding factors ? such as (human immunodeficiency virus) HIV and the times at which sufferers sought medical help. This study suggests that there is a pressing need to improve our understanding of the socio-economic aspects of problems affecting public health, such as TB in the United States.
i. Statement of the problem
People in economically disadvantaged positions living in medically under-served communities are at an increased risk for tuberculosis. The disease does continue to be a barometer of poverty and race, but there are other significant factors associated with the incidence of TB. Studies in South Africa suggest that those qualified as black or coloured had significantly less access to health care, and thus stood less chance of being diagnosed than their white counterparts (Andersson 1990). Those in this disadvantaged condition tended to suffer disproportionately from other socio-economic related medical factors, such as malnutrition and incidence of HIV/AIDS that are closely linked with the incidence of TB.
The pattern is similar in other countries, including the USA. The problem in the United States is that there is limited population-based data on TB by social class (Lifson et al. 1999). There is even less data on the incidence of seeking medical care between the onset of symptoms and the visit to a medical center. The incidence of TB is indeed higher among low income people because they are less likely to seek medical care. But the objective of this study is to suggest that there are other critical factors in the complex social dimension of public health problems associated with TB. These will be discussed in parts iii and iv of this section.
ii. Literature review
During the 1980s and 1990s, there have been dramatic transformations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in the United States (Bloch et al. 1996). As TB morbidity began to increase in 1985, after an all-time U.S. low, a significant number of studies were begun to explain the phenomenon. Some of the conclusions of this study will be based on the extensive current literature attempting to explain this recent increase in TB morbidity. Two of the most important factors have been the available evidence on HIV co-infection, and the incidence of TB among the foreign-born. Alan Block et al. (1996) have done an excellent exploratory study of this theme, entitled ?The need for epidemic intelligence?. The study sends the powerful message to a U.S. audience of the importance of further research into the implications of race and social class in areas like urban health policy. This is particularly true in cases of the emergence of a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB).
Some work has also been done on the regional variations of TB in the United States that is of great value for studies like this one. For instance, Subroto Baerji et al. (1996) have researched and written a study entitled ?Tuberculosis in San Diego County: a border community perspective?, which takes into consideration a population in transition and the effects on the incidence of TB in that district. Pappas Dievler (1999) has done a similar investigation of Washington D.C., specializing in the HIV/AIDS angle and the implications of social class and race for urban public health policy making.
Some interesting work has also been done on the epidemiology of TB in low-income areas. A.R. Lifson et al. (1999) have done a study called ?Tuberculin skin testing among economically disadvantaged youth in a federally-funded job training program.? For this study, the valuable aspect of Lifson et al.?s paper was the following finding: that differences in geographic region of residence were not significant after adjusting for other factors. This has implications for the importance of screening groups at risk for tuberculous infection, as well as for public health policy and services offered in high-risk areas.
It has also proven useful to investigate international cases wherein race and class factor in. N. Andersson?s study ?Tuberculosis and social stratification in South Africa? (1990), suggests that poverty, race and the incidence of tuberculosis were a global phenomenon. In the South African case, the risk of TB for people categorized by the state as ?black? or ?colored? are 27 and 16 times (respectively) as related to the risk for whites. The author argues that whites with the disease stand a greater chance of being diagnosed than their black counterparts, namely because of their improved access to health care. There is much to be learned in the American context by viewing the incidence of TB among low-income, medically under-served communities in other districts and countries.
Finally, because TB is a social health problem, it has been invaluable to investigate media reports in addition to strictly medical material. It is unclear to what extent there is a ?public education? aspect to press releases on the incidence of tuberculosis among low-income areas. But the press has much to say regarding the link between national and local cases ? like those investigated here ? and the global context. Consider Susan Okie?s article, ?TB Tests of Immigrants Urged: Panel offers blueprint to eliminate the disease in U.S.? (2000), or Ines Capdevila?s piece ?Morella, Brown Sponsor bill to curb tuberculosis abroad? (2000).
iii. The need for current study
During the mid-1980s, there was a significant annual decline in the incidence of tuberculosis in the United States. The disease reached an all time low of 22,201 cases in 1985, though reported cases rose 20% to 26,673 in 1992 (Bloch et al. 1996).
There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest the reasons for this excess morbidity. Studies do suggest that that HIV infection and TB in the foreign-born who immigrate to the US as responsible in large part (Bloch et al. 1996). In 1999, 43% of the 17,500 new cases of TB in the USA occurred in people born elsewhere ? a figure that was only 27% in 1992 (Okie 2000).
If this alarming upward trend in excess morbidity were not enough, the need for the current study is further justified by the emergence of a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The pattern for MDR TB has been that it has comprised 2% of tested isolates over the past 5 years (the report was written in 1996) of a current San Diego County-based study (Baerji et al. 1996).
There are clear socio-economic factors which have direct implications for the incidence of TB. The fact that low income people are less likely to seek medical care is only one of these factors. Using the Harlem and South Central districts, this study will attempt to demonstrate that the likelihood of seeking medical care is only one contributing factor to why tuberculosis is higher in such low-income areas.
This study supports the conclusions of Alan Bloch (Bloch et al. 1989), wherein TB is described as primarily and increasingly a disease of the foreign-born and of the economically disadvantaged. The hypothesis of this paper is that the incidence of tuberculosis is higher among low income people because they are less likely to seek medical care. It is clear that there is a great deal of regional variation in tuberculosis morbidity in the United States. This study considers two districts that compare in terms of race and income level, these being South Central and Harlem. Both are low-income areas with high percentages of immigrants, where large percentages are Hispanic and black.
There is limited population-based data on tuberculosis among people on race and level of income. This study will use (hypothetical) statistics from 1989 to 1993 to describe the epidemiology of TB in South Central and Harlem, USA. The author examines the pattern of the disease occurrence in these two districts on the basis of race and income level. From this analysis, this study attempts to identify if the risk of TB is higher among low-income people because they are less likely to seek medical care. The study also investigates other factors such as co-infection with HIV, which provides information to help target sub-populations and districts where prevention and control programs should be directed.
ii. measures and subjects
To measure the incidence of tuberculosis and social stratification in these two districts, this study uses denominator data from Health, United States, National Center for Health Statistics, 1993. Data for New York has been obtained from the 1990 U.S. census. Data on those TB patients infected with HIV were obtained from a separate and confidential data base.
The subjects were people infected with TB in the low-income areas of South Central and Harlem on the basis of 1,860 cases that were reported in each area. These cases were confirmed either bacteriologically or clinically for patients aged 20 to 45 years. Age adjustment was accounted for using the direct method with 1990 U.S. population statistics as follows: aged 15-24 (80,596,000); aged 45-46 (46,710,000) (Tuberculosis control law 1993).
iii. data analysis and results
1860 cases were explored in both South Central and Harlem. Both districts are low-income, medically under-served communities with large numbers of immigrants such as Hispanics, blacks or Asian-Pacific Islanders. The data was evaluated with the objective of describing the incidence of TB of various racial-ethnic groups from the low-income areas mentioned above, over a five-year period. The incidence of tuberculosis was highest among those aged 25-44 in both areas, with South Central at 40.5% and Harlem at 40%. The majority of cases in both areas were also comprised of immigrants. More than 60% of cases in South Central were among immigrants, and 95% of these were either Asian/Pacific Islanders or Hispanics. The Asian/Pacific Islanders consistently rated with the highest incidence of TB in South Central over the five year period, followed by Hispanics. Incidence of TB among Asians averaged approximately 4 times greater than the rate for New York as a whole. In Harlem, non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics constituted the largest number of cases. In both areas, non-Hispanic whites had the lowest rates of TB throughout the five years in question. Comparisons with other non-Hispanic, non-Asian whites clearly demonstrate that ethnic minorities show an excess of TB morbidity.
People co-infected with HIV more than doubled during the five year period from 1989 to 1993. For instance, there were 25 cases reported in 1989, which rose to 54 by 1993 in these districts taken together. 200 HIV/TB cases were reported during the five year interval, of which 180 of 200 were male, and 152 of 200 were between the ages of 25-44. Of these, Hispanics comprised the largest proportion at 42.4%, followed by non-Hispanic Whites (36.7%), non-Hispanic blacks followed at 17.1%, and finally Asians at 4.0%. There is a clear overlap of the incidence of TB and HIV with the cases used in this study. In other areas, the economically disadvantaged living in medically under-served communities tend also to be undernourished, unemployed and sometimes homeless. In the two areas in question in this study, there is also an increased risk of re-infection with TB not only for those co-infected with HIV, but for others whose living conditions and access to medical care (and surveillance during treatment to ensure that the course of medication is carried out) is poor.
Both South Central and Harlem are populated metropolitan areas with a rapid influx of immigrants who keep the population fluid and ethnically diverse. On a national level, the ethnic breakdown of the 3 million U.S. residents were classified as follows in 1993, the last year of this study: 65% were classified as non-Hispanic whites; 20% as Hispanic; 7% as Asian/Pacific Islanders; and 6% as non-Hispanic blacks (Baerji et al. 1996). Again, on a national scale, these statistics relate to verified TB cases as follows: 42.4% of patients were Hispanic; 28.8%, Asian/Pacific Islanders; 10.1% were non-Hispanic blacks; and 18.4% were non-Hispanic whites (Baerji et al. 1996). To add more recent statistics to these figures, 98% of the 2 million annual global deaths from TB, and as much as 95% of the new active cases (numbering 8 million), are recorded in developing countries such as India, Nepal, Uganda and Cambodia, or in the former Soviet Republics (Capdevila 2000). More specific to the U.S., the Atlanta-based Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported that foreign-born people comprised 41% of the 18,361 cases of TB reported in America in 1998 (Capdevila 2000). In 1999, 43 of the reported 17,500 cases were among the foreign-born (Okie 2000). Consider that in 1992, the figure was 27% (Okie 2000). Even more alarmingly, the World Health Organization reports that there are between 10 and 15 million people in the U.S. who have latent tuberculosis (Capdevila 2000).
It is evident from these results that the incidence of TB is higher in ethnic groups, particularly among males between the ages of 25 and 44. This might be due to factors such as working conditions, nutrition, drug and alcohol abuse and HIV infection. Therefore, returning to the hypothesis, this study suggests that the incidence of tuberculosis is indeed higher among low-income people because they are less likely to seek medical care. But to say so it only to begin, not to conclude the search for answers regarding TB in people of this background. The objective of this study has been to suggest that the risk of TB itself is higher in low-income areas, which also tend to be medically under-served. In this sense, this study supports Alan Bloch et al.?s (1996) findings, these being that given the recent changes in the epidemiology of TB in the U.S., public health officials nationwide must consider expanded surveillance variables, such as co-infection with HIV. The nature of low-income communities must also be further i