The Inverted Narcissist Essay, Research Paper
The Clinical Picture and Developmental Roots – Opening Remarks TerminologyCo-dependents People who depend on other people for their emotional gratification and the performance of ego or daily functions. They are needy, demanding, submissive. They fear abandonment, cling and display immature behaviors in their effort to maintain the “relationship” with their companion or mate upon whom they depend. No matter what abuse is inflicted upon them – they remain in the relationship.
See also the definition of the “Dependent Personality Disorder” in the DSM IV.
Inverted Narcissist Previously called “covert narcissist”, this is a co-dependent who depends exclusively on narcissists.
If you live with a narcissist, have a relationship with them, are married to them, work with them, etc. – it does NOT mean that you are an inverted narcissist.
To “qualify” as an inverted narcissist – you must WANT to be in a relationship with a narcissist, regardless of any abuse inflicted on you by him / her. You must ACTIVELY seek relationships with narcissists – and ONLY with narcissists – no matter what your (bitter and traumatic) past experience has been. You must feel EMPTY and UNHAPPY in relationships with ANY OTHER kind of person. Only THEN – AND if you satisfy the other diagnostic criteria of a Dependent Personality Disorder – can you be safely diagnosed as an “Inverted Narcissist”.
IntroductionThe DSM IV defines the NPD using a few criteria. It is sufficient to possess 5 of them to “qualify”. Thus, theoretically, it is possible to be NPD WITHOUT grandiosity. Many researchers (to mention a few: Alexander Lowen, Jeffrey Satinover, Theodore Millon) suggested a “taxonomy” of pathological narcissism. They divided narcissists to sub-groups (very much as I did with my somatic versus cerebral narcissist dichotomy – SV). Lowen, for instance, talks about the “phallic” narcissist versus others. Satinover makes a very important distinction between narcissists who were raised by abusive parents – and those who were raised by doting mothers or domineering mothers. See an expansion of the Satinover classification in: http://narcissism.cjb.net/faq64.htmlIn “Psychodynamic Psychiatry in Clinical Practice/ The DSM-IV Edition’s comments on Cluster B Personality Disorders – Narcissistic” we find this:
“…what definitive criteria can be used to differentiate healthy from pathological narcissism? The time honored criteria of psychological health – to love and to work – are only partly useful in answering this question.”
“An individual’s work history may provide little help in making the distinction. Highly disturbed narcissistic individuals may find extraordinary success in certain professions, such as big business, the arts, politics, the entertainment industry, athletics and televangelism field. In some cases, however, narcissistic pathology may be reflected in a superficial quality to one’s professional interests, as though achievement in and acclaim are more important than mastery of the field itself.
Pathological forms of narcissism are more easily identified by the quality of the individual’s relationships. One tragedy affecting these people is their inability to love. Healthy interpersonal relationships can be recognized by qualities such as empathy and concern for the feelings of others, a genuine interest in the ideas of others, the ability to tolerate ambivalence in long-term relationships without giving up, and a capacity to acknowledge one’s own contribution to interpersonal conflicts. People who are characterized by these qualities may at times use others to gratify their own needs, but the tendency occurs in the broader context of sensitive interpersonal relatedness rather than as a pervasive style of dealing with other people. One the other hand, the person with a narcissistic personality disorder approaches people as objects to be used up and discarded according to his or her needs, without regard for their feelings. People are not viewed as having a separate existence or as having needs of their own. The individual with a narcissistic personality disorder frequently ends a relationship after a short time, usually when the other person begins to make demands stemming from for his or her own needs. Most importantly, such relationships clearly do not “work” in terms of the narcissist’s ability to maintain his or her own sense of self-esteem.”
…These criteria (the DSM IV’s – SV) identify a certain kind of narcissistic patient – specifically, the arrogant, boastful, “noisy” individual who demands to be in the spotlight. However, they fail to characterize the shy, quietly grandiose, narcissistic individual whose extreme sensitivity to slights leads to an assiduous avoidance of the spotlight.”
The DSM-III-R incorporated an allusion to at least TWO TYPES of narcissists, but the DSM-IV committee chose to delete this: “… included criterion, “reacts to criticism with feelings of rage, shame, or humiliation (even not if expressed)” due to lack of “specificity”.
Others theoreticians, clinicians and researchers similarly suggested a division between “The Oblivious Narcissist” (aka overt) and “The Hypervigilant Narcissist” (aka covert).
The Compensatory versus the Classic NarcissistAnother interesting distinction suggested by Dave Kelly in his excellent PTYPES web site is between the “Compensatory” type NPD (the one around which my “Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited” revolves) and the “Classic” NPD (DSM IV type):
Here are the Compensatory NPD criteria according to Dave Kelly:
Ptypes Personality Types proposes Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Disorder as a pervasive pattern of unstable, covert narcissistic behaviors that derive from an underlying sense of insecurity and weakness rather than from genuine feelings of self-confidence and high self-esteem, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by six (or more) of the following:
The basic trait of the Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Type is a pattern of “overtly narcissistic behaviors [that] derive from an underlying sense of insecurity and weakness, rather than from genuine feelings of self-confidence and high self-esteem” (Millon).
The Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Type: seeks to create an illusion of superiority and to build up an image of high self-worth (Millon);
strives for recognition and prestige to compensate for the lack of a feeling of self-worth;
may “acquire a deprecatory attitude in which the achievements of others are ridiculed and degraded” (Millon);
has persistent aspirations for glory and status (Millon);
has a tendency to exaggerate and boast (Millon);
is sensitive to how others react to him, watches and listens carefully for critical judgment, and feels slighted by disapproval (Millon);
“is prone to feel shamed and humiliated and especially [anxious] and vulnerable to the judgments of others” (Millon);
covers up a sense of inadequacy and deficiency with pseudo-arrogance and pseudo-grandiosity (Millon);
has a tendency to periodic hypochondria (Forman);
alternates between feelings of emptiness and deadness and states of excitement and excess energy (Forman);
entertains fantasies of greatness, constantly striving for perfection, genius, or stardom (Forman);
has a history of searching for an idealized partner and has an intense need for affirmation and confirmation in relationships (Forman);
frequently entertains a wishful, exaggerated, and unrealistic concept of himself which he can’t possibly measure up to (Reich);
produces (too quickly) work not up to the level of his abilities because of an overwhelmingly strong need for the immediate gratification of success (Reich);
is touchy, quick to take offense at the slightest provocation, continually anticipating attack and danger, reacting with anger and fantasies of revenge when he feels himself frustrated in his need for constant admiration (Reich);
is self-conscious, due to a dependence on approval from others (Reich);
suffers regularly from repetitive oscillations of self-esteem (Reich);
seeks to undo feelings of inadequacy by forcing everyone’s attention and admiration upon himself (Reich);
may react with self-contempt and depression to the lack of fulfillment of his grandiose expectations (Riso).
Sources:
Forman, Max, (1976). Narcissistic disorders and the oedipal fixations. In Feldstein, J. J., (Ed.), The Annual of Psychoanalysis. Vol. IV. pp. 65-92, New York: International Universities.
Millon, Theodore, and Roger D. Davis. Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1996. pp. 411-12.
Reich, Annie, (1986). Pathological forms of self-esteem regulation. In Morrison, A. P., (Ed.), Essential Papers on Narcissism. pp. 44-60. Reprint from (1960) Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. Vol. 15, pp. 205-32.
Riso, Don Richard. Personalty Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-discovery. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987. pp. 102-3.
Speculative Diagnostic Criteria for Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Disorder A pervasive pattern of self-inflation, pseudo-confidence, exhibitionism, and strivings for prestige, that compensates for feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem, as indicated by the following:
pseudo-confidence compensating for an underlying condition of insecurity and feelings of helplessness
pretentiousness; self-inflation
exhibitionism in the pursuit of attention, recognition, and glory
strivings for prestige to enhance self-esteem
deceitfulness and manipulativeness in the service of maintaining feelings of superiority
idealization in relationships
fragmentation of the self: feelings of emptiness and deadness
a proud, hubristic disposition
hypochondriasis
Substance abuse
self-destructiveness
Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Disorder corresponds to Ernest Jones’s narcissistic “God Complex”, Annie Reich’s “compensatory narcissism”, Heinz Kohut’s “Narcissistic Personality Disorder”, and Theodore Millon’s “Compensatory Narcissist”.
Millon, Theodore, and Roger D. Davis. Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1996. 411-12.
Compare this to the classic type:
Narcissistic Personality Type The basic trait of the Narcissistic Personality Type is a pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy.
The Narcissistic Personality Type: reacts to criticism with feelings of rage, shame, or humiliation;
is interpersonally exploitive: takes advantage of others to achieve his own ends;
has a grandiose sense of self-importance;
believes that his problems are unique and can be understood only by other special people;
is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love;
has a sense of entitlement: an unreasonable expectation of especially favorable treatment;
requires much attention and admiration of others;
lacks empathy: fails to recognize and experience how others feel;
is preoccupied with feelings of envy.
This is mainly the DSM – III – R view. Pay attention to the not so subtle changes in the DSM IV – SV:
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition describes Narcissistic Personality Disorder as a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements);
is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love;
believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions);
requires excessive admiration;
has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations;
is interpersonally exploitive, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends;
lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others;
is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her;
shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.
Summarized from: American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washington: Author, 1994.
The Inverted Narcissist It is clear to us that there is, indeed, a type ofnarcissist, hitherto rather neglected and obscure. It is the “self-effacing” or “introverted” narcissist. We call it the “Inverted Narcissist” (hereinafter: “IN”).
This is a narcissist who, in many respects, is the mirror image of the “classical” narcissist. No one is sure why. The psychodynamics of such a narcissist are not clear, nor are his developmental roots. Perhaps he is the product of a doting or domineering primary object/caregiver. Perhaps excessive abuse leads to the repression of even the narcissistic and other defense mechanisms against such abuse. Perhaps the parents suppressed every manifestation of grandiosity (very common in early childhood) and of narcissism – so that the defense mechanism that narcissism is was “inverted” and internalized in this unusual form.
These narcissists are self-effacing, sensitive, emotionally fragile, sometimes socially phobic. They import all their self-esteem and sense of self-worth from the outside (others), are pathologically envious (a transformation of aggression), are likely to intermittently engage in aggressive/violent behaviors, are more emotionally labile that the classic narcissist, etc.
We can, therefore talk about three “basic” types of narcissists:
(a) The offspring of neglecting parents
They resort to narcissism as the predominant object relation (with themselves as the exclusive object).
(b) The offspring of doting or domineering parents (often narcissists themselves)
They internalized these voices in the form of a sadistic, ideal, immature superego and spend their
lives trying to be perfect, omnipotent, omniscient and to be judged “a success” by these
parent-images.
(c) The offspring of abusive parents
They internalize the abusing, demeaning and contemptuous voices and spend their lives in an effort
to elicit “counter-voices” from their human environment and thus to extract a modicum of self esteem
and sense of selfworth.
All three types exhibit recursive, recurrent and Sysiphean failure. Shielded by their protective shells (defense mechanisms) they constantly gauge reality wrongly, their actions and reactions become more and more rigid and ossified and the damage inflicted by them on themselves and on others ever greater.
The Narcissistic parent seems to employ a myriad of primitive defenses in his dealings with his children. Splitting- idealizing the child and devaluing him in cycles which reflect internal dynamics of the parent rather than anything the child does. Projective Identification – forcing the child into behaviors and traits which reflect the parents’ fears regarding himself, his self image and his self worth. This is a particularly powerful and pernicious mechanism. If the narcissist parent fears his own deficiencies (”defects”), vulnerability, perceived weakenesses, susceptibility, gullibility, or emotions – he is likely to force the child to “feel” these rejected and (to him) repulsive emotions, to behave in ways strongly abhorred by the parent, to exhibit character traits the parent strongly rejects in himself. The child, in a way, becomes the “trash bin” of the parents’ inhibitions, fears, self loathing, self contempt, perceived lack of self worth, sense of inadequacy and failure and emotional reticence. Coupled with the treatment of the child by the parent as a continuation of himself by other means, it serves to totally inhibit the psychological growth and emotional maturation of the child. The child becomes an extension of the parent – a vessel through which the parent experiences and realizes himself for better (hopes, aspirations, ambition, life goals) and for worse (weknesses, “undesirable” emotions, “negative” traits). A host of other, simpler, defense mechanisms put to use by the parent is likely to obscure the predominant use of projective identification: projection, displacement, intellectualization, depersonalization. Relationships between such parents and their progeny easily deteriorate to sexual or other modes abuse because there are no functioning boundaries between them.
It seems that the reaction to a narcissistic parent can be either accommodation and assimilation or rejection.
ACCOMMODATION and ASSIMILATION The child accommodates, idealizes and internalizes the primary object successfully. This means that the “internal voice” we all have is a narcissistic voice and that the child tries to comply with its directives and with its explicit and perceived wishes. The child becomes a masterful provider of narcissistic supply, a perfect match to the parent’s personality, an ideal source, an accommodating, understanding and caring caterer to all the needs, whims, mood swings and cycles of the narcissist,an endurer of devaluation and idealization with equanimity, a superb adapter to the narcissist’s world view, in short: the ultimate extension. This is what we came to call an “inverted narcissist”.
We must not neglect the abusive aspect of such a relationship. The Narcissistic primary object always alternates between idealization of his progeny and its evaluation. The child is likely to internalize the devaluing, abusive, demeaning, berating, diminishing, minimizing, upbraiding, chastising voice. The parent (or caregiver) keeps living inside him (as part of a sadistic and ideal superego and an unrealistic ego ideal, to resort to psychoanalytic parlance for the sake of illustration). It is this voice that inhibits the development of reactive narcissism, the defense mechanism in the child. No grandiosity, sense of entitlement or total lack of empathy is possible in these circumstances.
The child turned adult maintains these traits. He keeps looking for narcissists in order to feel whole, alive and wanted. He seeks to be treated by a narcissist narcissistically (what others would call abuse is to him or her a homecoming and narcissistic supply). To him, the narcissist is a source of supply (primary or secondary) and the narcissistic behaviors constitute narcissistic supply. He feels dissatisfied, empty and unloved if not by a narcissist.
The roles of Primary Source of Narcissistic Supply (PSNS) and Secondary Source of Narcissistic Supply (SSNS) are reversed. To the inverted narcissist, a spouse is a source of PRIMARY supply, for instance.
The other reaction to the narcissistic parent is
REJECTION The child may react to the narcissism of the Primary Object with a peculiar type of rejection. He will develop his own narcissistic personality, replete with grandiosity and lack of empathy – BUT his personality will be antithetical to the personality of the narcissistic parent. If the parent were a somatic narcissist – he is likely to be a cerebral one, if his father prided himself on his virtue – he will emphasize his vices, if his mother bragged about her frugality, he is bound to flaunt his wealth.
An Attempted DSM style List of CriteriaWe came up with a DSM-IV “style” inventory for an inverted narcissist, using the narcissists’ characteristics as a template, because they are, in many ways two sides of the same coin, or “the mold and the molded” hence “mirror narcissist” or “inverted narcissist”.
The Narcissist tries to merge with an idealized but badly internalized object. They do so by “digesting” the meaningful others in their lives and transforming them into extensions of their selves. They employ various techniques to achieve this. To the “digested” this is the crux of the harrowing experience called “living with a narcissist”.
The “Inverted Narcissist”, on the other hand, does not attempt, except in fantasy or in dangerous, masochistic sexual practice, to merge with an idealized external object. This is because he so successfully internalized the narcissistic primary object, to the exclusion of all else. The IN feels ill at ease in a relationship with a non-narcissist because it is unconsciously perceived by him to be “betrayal”, “cheating”, an abrogation of the exclusivity clause he had with the narcissistic primary object.
This is the big difference between narcissists and their inverted version. The former REJECTED the primary object in particular (and object relations in general) in favour of a handy substitute: themselves.
The IN accepted the (narcissist) primary object and internalized it – to the exclusion of all others (unless they are perceived by him to be faithful renditions, replica of the narcissistic primary object).
Criterion ONE The IN possesses a rigid sense of lack of self-worth The narcissist has a badly regulated sense of self-worth. However this is not conscious. He goes through cycles of self-devaluation (and experiences them as dysphorias). The IN’s sense of self worth does NOT fluctuate. It is rather stable – but it is very low. Whereas the narcissist devalues others – the IN devalues himself as an offering, a sacrifice to the narcissist. The IN preempts the narcissist by devaluing himself, by actively devaluing his own achievements, or talents. The IN is exceedingly distressed when singled out because of actual achievements or demonstration of superior skills.
Narcissism MUST include a component of active and conscious grandiose self-image. Some narcissists punish themselves by self-defeating and self-destructive behavior – but if they actively avoid narcissistic supply, they are not narcissists. There is a host of other PDs which incorporate this criterion (social phobia, schizoid PD and many others) of self-devaluation and the IN is bound to exhibit many of the traits of these disorders as well.
The inverted narcissist is compelled to filter all of their narcissistic needs through the primary narcissist in their lives, no independence is permitted. The IN is amplified by the narcissist’s commentary (because nothing can be accomplished by the invert without the approval of a primary narcissist in their lives).
Criterion TWO Pre-occupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance and beauty or of an ideal of love This is the same as the DSM-IV criterion for narcissistic personality disorder but manifests with the IN absolutely differently, i.e.., the cognitive dissonance is sharper here because the IN is so absolutely and completely convinced of their worthlessness that these fantasies are extremely painful ‘dissonances’.
With the narcissist, the dissonance exists on two levels:
Between the UNCONSCIOUS feeling of lack of stable self worth and the grandiose fantasies AND between the grandiose fantasies and reality (the Grandiosity Gap).
In comparison, the “Inverted Narcissist” can only vacillate between lack of self worth and reality, there is no grandiosity permitted, except in dangerous, forbidden fantasy. This shows that the invert is psychologically incapable of fully realizing their inherent potentials without a primary narcissist to filter the praise, adulation or accomplishment through. They MUST have someone to whom praise can be redirected. The dissonance between the certainty of unworthiness coupled with genuine praise that cannot be deflected is likely to derail the inverted narcissist every time.
Criterion THREE Believes that he is absolutely un-unique and un-special (i.e., worthless and not worthy of merger with the fantasized ideal) and that no one at all could understand him because he is innately unworthy of being understood. The IN becomes very agitated the more one tries to understand him because that also offends against his righteous sense of being properly excluded from the human race. A sense of worthlessness is typical of many other PDs (AND the feeling that no one could ever understand them). The narcissist himself endures prolonged periods of self-devaluation, self-deprecation and self-effacement. This is part of the narcissistic cycle. In this sense, the Inverted Narcissist is a PARTIAL narcissist in that he is permanently fixated in a part of the narcissist wheel, never to experience its complementary half: the narcissistic grandiosity and sense of entitlement.
The ‘righteous sense of being properly excluded’ comes from the sadistic superego in concert with the ‘overbearing, externally re-inforced, conscience’.
Criterion FOUR Demands anonymity (in the sense of seeking to remain excluded at all costs) and is intensely irritated and uncomfortable with any attention being paid to him – similar to the Schizoid PD. Criterion FIVE Feels that he is undeserving and not entitled. Feels that he is inferior to others, lacking, insubstantial, unworthy, unlikeable, unlovable, someone to scorn and dismiss, or to ignore.
Criterion SIX Is extinguishingly selfless, sacrificial, even unctuous in his interpersonal relationships and will avoid the assistance of others at all costs. Can only interact with others when he can be seen to be giving, supportive, and expending an unusual effort to assist. Some narcissists behave the same way but only as a means to obtain Narcissistic Supply (praise, adulation, affirmation, attention).This must not be confused with the behavior of the IN.
Criterion SEVEN Lacks empathy. Is intensely attuned to others’ needs, but only in so far as it relates to his own need to perform the required self-sacrifice, which in turn is necessary in order for the IN to obtain his narcissistic supply from the primary narcissist. By contrast, Narcissists are never empathic. They are intermittently attuned to others only in order to optimize the extraction of narcissistic supply from them.
Criterion EIGHT Envies others. Cannot conceive of being envied and becomes extremely agitated and uncomfortable if even brought into a situation where comparison might occur – loathes competition and will avoid competition at all costs, if there is any chance of actually winning the competition, or being singled out.Criterion NINE Displays extreme shyness, lack of any real relational connections, is publicly self-effacing in the extreme, is internally highly moralistic and critical of others; is a perfectionist and engages in lengthy ritualistic behaviours, which can never be perfectly performed (obsessive-compulsive, though not necessarily to the full extent exhibited in OCD). Notions of being individualistic are anathema.
The Reactive Patterns of the Inverted Narcissist (IN)The inverted narcissist does not suffer from a “milder” form of narcissism. Like them, it has degrees and shades. But it is much more rare and the DSM IV variety is the more prevalent.
The Inverted Narcissist is liable to react with rage whenever threatened (as all of us do).
When envious of other people’s achievements, ability to feel, wholeness, happiness, rewards and successes, when his sense of self-worthlessness is enhanced by a behavior, a comment, an event, when his lack of self-worth and void of self-esteem is THREATENED (so this narcissist might surprisingly react violently or ragefully to GOOD things: a kind remark, a mission accomplished, a reward, a compliment, a proposition, a sexual advance).
When thinking about the past, when emotions and memories are evoked (usually negative ones) by a certain music, a given smell, a sight.
When his pathological envy leads to an all-pervasive sense of injustice and being discriminated against or treated unjustly by a spiteful world.
When he encounters stupidity, avarice, dishonesty, bigotry – it is these qualities in him that the narcissist really fears and rejects so vehemently in others.
When he believes that he failed (and he always entertains this belief), that he is imperfect and useless and worthless, a good for nothing half-baked creature.
When he realizes to what extent his inner demons possess him, constrain his life, torment him, deform him and the hopelessness of it all.
Then even the inverted narcissist rages. He becomes verbally and emotionally abusive. He deploys unfairly things told to him in confidence. He uncannily pierces the soft spots of his target, and mercilessly drives home the poisoned dagger of despair and self loathing until it infects his adversary.
The calm after such a storm is even eerier, a thundering silence, indeed. The narcissist regrets his behavior but would rarely admit his feelings, though he might apologize profusely.
He simply nurtures his feelings as yet another weapon of self destruction and self defeat. It is from this very suppressed self contempt, from the very repressed and introverted judgment, from this missing emotional atonement that the narcissistic rage springs forth. Thus the vicious cycle is established.
One important difference between Inverted Narcissists and Non-Narcissists is that the former are less likely to react with PTSD (Post Traumatic Shock Syndrome) following a relationship with a narcissist. They seem to be “desensitized” to narcissists by their early upbringing. Whereas the reactions of normal people to narcissistic behavior patterns (and especially to the splitting and projective identification defense mechanisms and to the idealization devaluation cycles) is shock, profound hurt and disorientation – Inverted Narcissists show none of the above.
The Life of the Inverted Narcissist The IN is, usually, exceedingly, painfully shy as a child. Despite this social phobia, his grandiosity (absorbed from the parent) might direct him to “limelight” professions and occupations which involve exposure, competition, “stage fright” and social friction. The setting can vary from the limited (family) to the expansive (national media) – but, whatever the setting, the result is a constant conflict and feeling of discomfort, even terror and extreme excitement and thrill (”adrenaline rush”). This is because the IN’s grandiosity is “imported” and not fully integrated. It is, therefore, not supportive of his “grandiose” pursuits (as is the case with the narcissist). On the contrary, the IN feels awkward, pitted on the edge of a precipice, contrived, false and misleading, not to say deceitful.
The Inverted Narcissist grows up in a suppressive environment. It could be an orthodox, hyper-religious, or traditionalist culture, a monovalent, “black and white”, doctrinarian and indoctrinating society – or a family which embodies all the above in a microcosm all of its own. The Inverted Narcissist is cast in a negative (emergent) role within his family. His “negativeness” is attributed to his gender, the order of his birth, religious, social, or cultural dictates and commandments, his “character flaws”, his attribution to a specific person or event, his acts or inaction and so on. In the words of one such IN:
“In the religious culture I grew up in. women are SO suppressed, their roles are so carefully restricted. They are the representation, in the flesh, of all that is sinful, degrading, of all that is wrong with the world. These are the negative gender/cultural images that were force fed to us the negative “otherness” of women, as defined by men, was fed to me. I was so shy, withdrawn, unable to really relate to people at all from as early as I can remember.”
The IN is subjected and exposed either to an overbearing, overvalued parent, or to an aloof, detached, emotionally unavailable one – or to both – at an early stage of his life.
“I grew up in the shadow of my father who adored me, put me on a pedestal, told me I could do or be anything I wanted because I was incredibly bright, BUT, he ate me alive, I was his property and an extension of him. I also grew up with the mounting hatred of my narcissist brother who got none of this attention from our father and got no attention from our mother either. My function was to make my father look wonderful in the eyes of all outsiders, the wonderful parent with a genius “wunderkind” as his last child, and the only child of the six that he was physically present to raise from the getgo. The overvaluation combined with being abjectly ignored or raged at by him when I stepped out of line even the tiniest bit, was enough to warp my personality.”
Rather than fall into full blown secondary narcissism, the invert cannot, or is not even allowed THAT dubious privilege. The invert is so heavily engaged in their pre-school years in satisfying the narcissistic parent, that the traits of grandiosity and self-love, need for adoration and narcissistic supply from ANY viable source, is not afforded to the invert.
The invert simply “knows” that only the narcissist parent can give the narcissistic supply to the invert. The narcissistic parent is so controlling that any attempt to garner praise or adulation from any other source (without the approval of the parent – who will co-opt that approval for themselves) is severely punished by swift devaluation and even the occasional spanking or abuse (physical, emotional, or sexual).
This is a vital part of the conditioning that gives rise to the distinction in our view. Where the narcissist exhibits grandiosity,the invert is intensely uncomfortable with personal praise, and wishes to always divert praise away from themselves onto another. This is why the IN can only truly FEEL anything when he is in relationship with another narcissist. The IN is conditioned and programmed from the very beginning to be the perfect companion to the narcissist. To feed their ego, to be purely an extension of them, to seek only praise and adulation for oneself if it brings greater praise and adulation for the narcissist.
The Inverted Narcissist’s Survival GuideListen attentively to everything the narcissist says and agree with it all. Don’t believe a word of it but let it slide as if everything is just fine, business as usual.
Personally offer something absolutely unique to the narcissist which they cannot obtain anywhere else. Also be prepared to line up future sources of primary NS for your narcissist because you will not be IT for very long, if at all. If you take over the procuring function for the narcissist, they become that much more dependent on you which makes it a bit tougher for them to pull their haughty stuff – an inevitability, in any case.
Be endlessly patient and go way out of your way to be accommodating, thus keeping the narcissistic supply flowing liberally, and keeping the peace (relatively speaking).
I get tremendous personal satisfaction out of endlessly giving. This one may not be attractive to you, but it is a take it or leave itproposition.
Be absolutely emotionally and financially independent of the narcissist. Take what you need: the excitement and engulfment (i.e., NS) and refuse to get upset or hurt when the narcissist does or says something dumb. Yelling back works really well but should be reserved for special occasions when you fear your narcissist may be on the verge of leaving you; the silent treatment is better as an ordinary response, but it must be carried out without any emotional content, more with the air of boredom and “I’ll talk to you later, when I am good and ready, and when you are behaving in a more reasonable fashion.
If your narcissist is cerebral and NOT interested in having much sex – then give yourself ample permission to have “hidden” sex with other people. Your cerebral narcissist will not be indifferent to infidelity so discretion and secrecy is of paramount importance.
If your narcissist is somatic and you don’t mind, join in on endlessly interesting group sex encounters but make sure that you choose properly for your narcissist. They are heedless and very undiscriminating in respect of sexual partners and that can get very problematic (STDs and blackmail come to mind).
If you are a “fixer” which most inverted narcissists are, then focus on fixing situations, preferably before they become “situations”. Don’t for one moment delude yourself that you can FIX the narcissist – it simply will not happen. Not because they are being stubborn – they just simply can’t be fixed.
If there is any fixing that can be done, it is to help your narcissist become aware of their condition, and this is VERY IMPORTANT, with no negative implications or accusations in the process at all. It is like living with a physically handicapped person and being able to discuss, calmly, unemotionally, what the limitations and benefits of the handicap are and how the two of you can work with these factors, rather than trying to change them.
FINALLY, and most important of all for the inverted narcissist: KNOW YOURSELF.
What are you getting from the relationship? Are you actually a masochist?
Why is this relationship attractive and interesting?
Define for yourself what good and beneficial things you believe you are receiving in this relationship.
Define the things that you find harmful TO YOU. Develop strategies to minimize the harm to
yourself. Don’t expect that you will cognitively be able to reason with the narcissist to change who
they are. You may have some limited success in getting your narcissist to tone down on the really
harmful behaviours THAT AFFECT YOU which emanate from the unchangeable WHAT the
narcissist is. This can only be accomplished in a very trusting, frank and open relationship.We firmly believe that it is only the inverted narcissist who can have a reasonably good, long lasting relationship with the narcissist. You must be prepared to give your narcissist a LOT of space and leeway. You don’t really exist for them as a fully realized person – no one does. They are not fully realized people so they cannot possibly have the skills, no matter how smart or sexy, to be a complete person in the sense that most adults are complete.
Somatic versus Cerebral Inverted NarcissistsThe Inverted Narcissist (IN) is really an erstwhile narcissist internalized by the IN. Inevitably, we are likely to find among the inverted the same propensities, predilections, preferences and inclinations as we do among proper narcissists.
The cerebral IN is an IN whose source of primary narcissistic supply lies – through the medium and mediation of a narcissist – in the exercise of his intellectual faculties. A somatic IN would tend to make use of his body, sex, shape or health in trying to secure NS for “his” narcissist.
The inverted narcissist feeds on the primary narcissist and this is his narcissistic supply. So these two typologies can, in essence become a self-supporting, symbiotic system. In reality though, both the narcissist and the inverted narcissist need to be quite well aware of the dynamics of this relationship in order to make this work as a successful long term arrangement. It might well be that this symbiosis would only work between a cerebral narcissist and a cerebral invert. The somatic narcissist’s capricious sexual dalliances would be far too threatening to the equanimity of the cerebral invert for there to be much chance of this succeeding, even for a short time.
It would seem that only opposing types of narcissists can get along when two classic narcissists are involved in a couple. It follows, syllogistically, that only identical types of narcissist and inverted narcissist can survive in a couple. In other words: the best, most enduring couples of narcissist and his inverted narcissist mate would involve a somatic narcissist and a somatic IN – or a cerebral narcissist and a cerebral IN.
Coping with Narcissists and Non-Narcissists The inverted narcissist is a person who grew up enthralled by the narcissistic parent. This parent engulfed and subsumed the child’s being to such an over-bearing extent that the child’s personality was irrevocably shaped by this engulfment, damaged beyond hope of repair. The child was not even able to develop defense mechanisms such as narcissism.
The end result is an inverted narcissistic personality. The traits of this personality are primarily evident in relationship ?ontexts. The child was conditioned by the narcissistic parent to only be entitled to feel whole, useful, productive, complete when the child was augmenting or mirroring back to the parent, their own sought after narcissistic image. As a result the child is shaped by this engulfment and cannot feel complete in any significant adult relationship unless they are with a narcissist.
The Inverted Narcissist in Relationship with the Narcissist The inverted narcissist is drawn to engaging in significant relationships with other narcissists in adulthood. These relationshipsare usually spousal primary relationships but can also be friendships with narcissists outside of the primary love relationship.
In a primary relationship, the inverted narcissist attempts to re-create the parent child relationship. The invert thrives on mirroring to the narcissist their own grandness and in so doing the invert obtains their OWN narcissistic supply (the dependence of the narcissist upon the invert for their Secondary Narcissistic Supply). The invert must have this form of relationship with a narcissist in order to feel complete and whole. The invert will go as far as he needs to in order to ensure that the narcissist is happy, cared for, properly adored as is the narcissists’ right. The invert glorifies his narcissist, placing him on a pedestal, enduring any and all narcissistic devaluation with calm equanimity, impervious to the overt slights of the narcissist.
Narcissistic rage is handled deftly and set aside without a thought by the inverted narcissist. The invert is exceedingly adept at managing every aspect of his life, tightly controlling all situations, so as to minimize the potential for the inevitable narcissistic rages of his narcissist.
The invert wishes to be subsumed by the narcissist. The invert only feels truly loved and alive in this kind of relationship. The invert is loathe to abandon his relationships with narcissists. The relationship will only end when the narcissist withdraws completely from the symbiotic nature of this relationship. Once the narcissist has determined that the invert is of no further use, and withholds all narcissistic supply from the invert, only then will the invert reluctantly move on to another relationship. The invert is most likely to equate sexual intimacy with engulfment. This can be easily misread to mean that the invert is himself a somatic narcissist. This interpretation is incorrect when dealing with the invert. The invert will endure years of minimal sexual contact with their narcissist and still be able to maintain the illusory feeling of intimacy and engulfment. The invert will find a myriad of other ways to “merge” with the narcissist, becoming intimately though only supportively involved with the narcissist’s business, career, any activity at all where the invert can feel that their support of the narcissist is irreplaceable, needed by the narcissist, indispensable. The invert is an expert at doling out narcissistic supply and will even go as far as procuring primary narcissistic supply for their narcissist (even where this means finding another lover for the narcissist, or participating in group sex with the narcissist). Usually though, the invert seems most attracted to the cerebral narcissist and finds him easier to manage than the somatic narcissist. The cerebral narcissist is disinterested in sex and this makes life considerably easier for the invert, i.e., the invert is less likely to “lose” their cerebral narcissist to another primary partner whereas a somatic narcissist may be prone to changing partners with greater frequency or wishes to have no partner, preferring to have multiple, casual sexual relationships of no apparent depth which never last very long.
The invert sees relationships with narcissists as the ONLY true and legitimate form of primary relationship. The invert is capable of having primary relationships with non-narcissists but will invariably feel very little in these relationships. Without engulfment the invert feels unneeded, hence unwanted in these relationships.
Relationships between the Inverted Narcissist and Non-NarcissistsThe inverted narcissist can maintain relationships outside of the symbiotic primary relationship with a narcissist. The difficulties encountered by the invert in this kind of relationship are that the invert will not “feel” loved because the non-narcissist is not “engulfing” them and hence the invert will tend to devalue their non-narcissistic primary partner as less than worthy of the inverts’ love and attention.
The invert may be able to sustain a relationship with a non-narcissist by finding other narcissistic symbiotic relationships outside of this primary relationship. The invert may have a narcissistic friend to whom the invert pays extraordinary attention, ignoring the real needs of the non-narcissistic partner.
Consequently, the only semi-stable primary relationship between the invert and the non-narcissist occurs where the non-narcissist is very easy going, emotionally secure and not needing much from the invert at all by way of time, energy or commitment to activities requiring both parties to be involved. In this sort of relationship, the invert may become a workaholic or become very involved in outside activities that have no connection with the non-narcissist spouse.
It appears that the inverted narcissist in relationship with a non-narcissist will, for all intents and purposes, be behaviourallyindistinguishable from a true narcissist with one important exception: the invert does not rage at his non-narcissist partner – he instead withdraws from the relationship even further where episodes of rage would normally occur for the narcissist.This passive-aggressive reaction has been noted, though, with narcissists as well.
Inverted and Other Atypical / Partial (NOS) Narcissists about ThemselvesCompetition and (pathological) Envy “I have a dynamic that comes up with every single person I get close to, where I feel extremely competitive toward and envious of the other person. But I don’t *act* competitive, because at the very outset, I see myself as the loser in the competition. I would never dream of trying to beat the other person, because I know deep in my heart that they would win and I would be utterly humiliated. There are fewer things on earth that feel worse to me than losing a contest and having the other person gloat over me, especially if they know how much I cared about not losing. This is one thing that I actually feel violent about. I guess I tend to project the grandiosity part of the NPD package onto the other person rather than on a false ego of my own. So most of the time I’m stuck in a state of deep resentment and envy toward her. To me, she’s always far more intelligent, likable, popular, talented, self-confident, emotionally developed, morally good, and attractive than I am. And I really hate her for that, and feel humiliated by it. So it’s incredibly hard for me to feel happy for this person when she has a success, because I’m overcome with humiliation about myself. This has ruined many a close relationship. I tend to get this way about one person at a time, usually the person who is playing the role of “my better half,” best friends or lovers/partners. So it’s not like I’m unable to be happy for anyone, ever, or that I envy every person I meet. I don’t get obsessed with how rich or beautiful movie stars are or anything like that. It only gets projected onto this partner-person, the person I’m depending on the most in terms of supplies (attention, reassurance, security, building up my self-esteem, etc.)…
…The really destructive thing that happens is, I see her grandiose traits as giving her the power to have anything and anyone she wants. So I feel a basic insecurity, because why should she stay with a loser like me, when she’s obviously so out of my league? So really, what I’m envious of is the power that all that talent, social ability, beauty, etc., gives her to have *choices* – the choice to stay or leave me. Whereas I am utterly dependent on her. It’s this emotional inequality that I find so humiliating.”
“I agree with the Inverted Narcissist designation – sometimes I’ve called myself a “closet narcissist.” That is, I’ve internalized the value system of grandiosity, but have not applied the grandiose identity to myself. I believe I *should be* those grandiose things, but at the same time, I know I’m not and I’m miserable about it. So people don’t think of me as having an inflated ego – and indeed I don’t – but scratch the surface, and you’ll find all these inflated expectations. I mean to say that perhaps the parents suppressed every manifestation of grandiosity (very common in early childhood) and of narcissism – so that the defense mechanism that narcissism is was “inverted” and internalized in this unusual form.”
“Maybe there aren’t two discrete states (NPD vs. “regular” low self-esteem) – maybe it’s more of a continuum. And maybe it’s just the degree and depth of the problem that distinguishes one from the other. My therapist describes NPD as “the inability to love oneself.” As she defines it, the “narcissistic wound” is a deep wounding of the sense of self, the image of oneself. That doesn’t mean that other disorders – or for that matter, other life stressors – can’t also cause low self-esteem. But I think NPD *is* low self-esteem… That’s what the disorder is really about – an image of yourself that is profoundly negative, and the inability to attain a normal and healthy self-image…
“Yes, I’m a survivor of child abuse. But remember that not all abuse is alike. There are different kinds of abuse, and different effects. My XXXX’s style of abuse had to do with trying to annihilate me as a separate person. It also had to do with the need to put all his negative self-image onto me – to see in me what he hated in himself. So I got to play the role of the loser that he secretly feared he was. I was flipped back and forth in those roles – sometimes I’d be a source of NS for him, and other times I was the receptacle of all his pain and rage. Sometimes my successes were used to reflect back on him, to show off to the rest of the family. Other times, my successes were threatening to my father, who suddenly feared that I was superior to him and had to be squelched. I experience emotions that most people I know don’t feel. Or maybe they do feel them, but to far less extreme intensity. For example, the envy and comparison/competition I feel toward others. I guess most of us have experienced rivalry, jealousy, being compared to others. Most of us have felt envy at another’s success. Yet most people I know seem able to overcome those feelings to some extent, to be able to function normally. In a competition, for example, they may be driven to do their best so they can win. For me, the fear of losing andbeing humiliated is so intense that I avoid competition completely. I am terrified of showing people that I care about doing well, because it’s so shaming for me if I lose. So I underachieve and pretend I don’t care. Most people I know may envy another person’s good luck or success, but it doesn’t prevent them from also being happy for them and supporting them. But for me,when I’m in a competitive dynamic with someone, I can’t hear about any of their successes, or compliments they’ve received, etc. I don’t even like to see the person doing good things, like bringing Thanksgiving leftovers to the sick old guy next door, because those things make me feel inferior for not thinking of doing that myself (and not having anyone in my life that I’d do that for). It’s just so incredibly painful for me to see evidence of the other person’s good qualities, because it immediately brings up my feeling of inferiority. I can’t even stand to date someone who looks really good, because I’m jealous of their good looks! So this deep and obsessive envy has destroyed my joy in other people. All the things about other people that I love and take pleasure in is a double-edged sword because I also hate them for it, for having those good qualities (while, presumably, I don’t). I don’t know – do you think this is garden-variety low self-esteem? I know plenty of people who suffer from lack of confidence, from timidity, social awkwardness, hatred of their body, feeling unlovable, etc. But they don’t have this kind of hostile, corrosive resentment of another person for being all the wonderful things that they can’t be, or aren’t allowed to be, etc. And one thing I hate is when people are judgmental of me about how I feel, as though I can help it. It’s like, “You shouldn’t be so selfish, you should feel happy for her that she’s successful,” etc. They don’t understand that I would love to feel those things, but I can’t. I can’t stop the incredible pain that explodes in me when these feelings get triggered, and I often can’t even *hide* the feelings. It’s just so overwhelming. I feel so damaged sometimes. There’s more, but that’s the crux of it for me, anyway.
Getting Compliments “I love getting compliments and rewards, and do not react negatively to them. In some moods, when my self-hate has gotten triggered, I can sometimes get to places where I’m inconsolable, because I get stuck in bitterness and self-pity, and so I doubt the sincerity or the reliability of the good thing that someone is saying to me (to try to cheer me up or whatever). But, if I’m in a reasonable mood and someone offers me something good, I’m all too happy to accept it! I don’t have a stake in staying miserable.”
The Partiality of the Condition “I do agree that it’s (atypical or inverted narcissism) not *milder*. But how I see it is that it’s *partial*. The part that’s there is just as destructive as it is in the typical narcissist. But there are parts missing from that total, full-blown disorder – and I see that as healthy, actually. I see it as parts of myself that *weren’t* infected by the pathology, that are still intact.
In my case, I did not develop the overweening ego part of the disorder. So in a sense, what you have with me is the naked pathology, with no covering: no suaveness, no charm, no charisma, no confidence, no persuasiveness, but also no excuses, no lies, no justifications for my feelings. Just the ugly self-hate, for all to see. And the self-hate part is just as bad as it is with a full-blown narcissist, so again, it’s not milder. But because I don’t have the denial part of the disorder, I have a lot more insight, a lot more motivation to do something about my problems (i.e., I “self-refer” to therapy), and therefore, I think, a lot more hope of getting better than people whose defense involves totally denying they even have a problem.”
“When my full-blown XXXX’s pathological envy would get triggered, he would respond by putting down the person he was envious of – or by putting down the accomplishment itself, or whatever good stuff the other person had. He’d trivialize it, or outright contradict it, or find some way to convince the other person (often me) that the thing they’re feeling good about isn’t real, or isn’t worthwhile, or is somehow bad, etc. He could do this because the inflated-ego defense was fully formed and operating with him. When *my* pathological envy gets triggered, I will be bluntly honest about it. I’ll say something self-pitying, such as, “You always get the good stuff, and I get nothing.” “You’re so much better than I.” “People like you better – you have good social skills and I’m a jerk.” and so on. Or I might even get hostile and sarcastic: “Well, it mustbe nice to have so many people worshipping you, isn’t it?” I don’t try to convince myself that the other person’s success isn’t real or worthwhile, etc. Instead, I’m totally flooded with the pain of feeling utterly inferior and worthless – and there’s no way for me to convince myself or anyone else otherwise. I’m not saying that the things I say are pleasant to hear – and it is still manipulative of me to say them, because the other person’s attention is drawn away from their joy and onto my pain and hostility. And instead of doubting their success’s worth or reality, they feel guilty about it, or about talking about it, because it hurts me so much. So from the other person’s point of view, maybe it’s not any easier to live with a partial narcissist than with a full-blown, in that their joys and successes lead to pain in both cases. It’s certainly not easier for me, being flooded with rage and pain instead of being able to hide behind a delusion of grandeur. But from my therapist’s point of view, I’m much better off because I know I’m unhappy – it’s in my face all the time. So I’m motivated to work on it and change it. And time has borne her words out. Over the past several years that I’ve worked on this issue, I have changed a great deal in how I deal with it. Now when the envy gets triggered, I don’t feel so entwined with the other person – I recognize that it’s my *own* pain getting triggered, not something they are doing to me. And so I can acknowledge the pain in a more responsible way, taking ownership of it by saying, “The jealousy feelings are getting triggered again, and I’m feeling worthless and inferior. Can you reassure me that I’m not?” That’s a lot better than making some snide, hostile, or self- pitying comment that puts the other person on the defensive or makes them feel guilty. … I do prefer the term “partial” because that’s what it feels like to me. It’s like a building that’s partially built – the house of narcissism. For me, the structure is there, but not the outside, so you can see inside the skeleton to all the junk that’s inside. It’s the same junk that’s inside a full-blown narcissist, but their building is completed, so you can’t see inside. Their building is a fortress, and it’s almost impossible to bring it down. My defenses aren’t as strong… which makes my life more difficult in some ways because I *really* feel my pain. But it also means that the house can be brought down more easily, and the junk inside cleaned out…”
Thinking about the Past and the World
“I don’t usually get rageful about the past. I feel sort of emotionally cut off from the past, actually. I remember events very clearly, but usually can’t remember the feelings. When I do remember the feelings, my reaction is usually one of sadness, and sometimes of relief, that I can get back in touch with my past. But not rage. All my rage seems to get displaced on the current people in my life.”
“… when I see someone being really socially awkward and geeky, passive-aggressive, indirect and victim-like, it does trigger anger in me because I identify with that person and I don’t want to. I try to put my negative feelings onto them, to see that person as the jerk, not me – that’s what a narcissist does, after all. But for me it doesn’t completely work because I know, consciously, what I’m trying to do. And ultimately, I’m not kidding anyone, least of all myself.”
Self Pity and Depression”More self-pity and depression here – not so much rage. One of the things that triggers my rage more than anything else is the inability to control another person, the inability to dominate them and force my reality on them. I feel impotent, humiliated, forced back on my empty self. Part of what I’m feeling here is envy: that person who can’t be controlled clearly has a self and I don’t, and I just hate them for it. But it’s also a power struggle – I want to get Narcissistic Supply by being in control and on top and having the other person submissive and compliant…”
Regretting, Admitting Mistakes “I regret my behavior horribly, and I *do* admit my feelings. I am also able, in the aftermath, to have empathy for the feelings of the person I’ve hurt, and I’m horribly sad about it, and ashamed of myself. It’s as though I’d been possessed by a demon, acted out all this abusive horrible stuff, and then, after the departure of the demon, I’m back in my right mind and it’s like, “What have I *done*??” I don’t mean I’m not responsible for what I did (i.e., a demon made me do it). But when I’m triggered, I have no empathy – I can only see my projection onto that person, as a huge threat to me, someone who must be demolished. But when my head clears, I see that person’s pain, hurt, fear – and I feel terrible. I want to make it up to them. And that feeling is totally sincere – it’s not an act. I’m genuinely sorry for the pain I’ve caused the other person.”
Rage “I wouldn’t say that my rage comes from repressed self-contempt (mine is not repressed – I’m totally aware of it). And it’s not missing atonement either, since I do atone. The rage comes from feeling humiliated, from feeling that the other person has somehow sadistically and gleefully made me feel inferior, that they’re getting off on being superior, that they’re mocking me and ridiculing me, that they have scorn and contempt for me and find it all very amusing. That – whether real or imagined (usually imagined) – is what causes my rage.”
Pursuing Relationships with Narcissists “There are some very few of us who actually seek out relationships with narcissists. We do this with the full knowledge that we are not wanted, despised even. We persist and pursue no matter the consequences, no matter the cost. I am an “Inverted Narcissist”. It is because as a child I was “imprinted/fixated” with a particular pattern involving relationships. I was engulfed so completely by my father’s personality and repressed so severely by various other factors in my childhood that I simply didn’t develop a recognizable personality. I existed purely as an extension of my father. I was his genius “wunderkind”. He ignored my mother and poured all his energy and effort into me. I did not develop full-blown secondary narcissism… I developed into the perfect “other half” of the narcissists molding me. I became the perfect, eager co-dependent. And this is an imprint, a pattern in my psyche, a way of (not) relating to the world of relationships by only being able to truly relate to one person (my father) and then one kind of person – the narcissist. He is my perfect lover, my perfect mate, a fit that is so slick and smooth, so comfortable and effortless, so filled with meaning and actual feelings – that’s the other thing. I cannot feel on my own. I am incomplete. I can only feel when I am engulfed by another (first it was my father) and now – well now it has to be a narcissist. Not just any narcissist either. He must be exceedingly smart, good looking, have adequate reproductive equipment and some knowledge on how to use it and that’s about it. When I am engulfed by someone like this I feel completed, I can actually FEEL. I am whole again. I function as a sibyl, an oracle, an extension of the narcissist. His fiercest protector, his purveyor/procurer of NS, the secretary, organizer, manager, etc. I think you get the picture and this gives me INTENSE PLEASURE.
So the answer to your question: “Why would anyone want to be with someone who doesn’t want them back?” The short answer is, “Because there is no one else remotely worth looking at”.
Making Amends “I mostly apologize, and I give the person spac