Presidential Debates 96


Presidential Debates 96 Essay, Research Paper

Philip Rubacha October 22, 1996

American Politics-Essay #1 Essay-Debate

The presidential debates between democratic President William Clinton and Republican Senator Robert Dole proved to be a game of “dodge-ball”. Bob Dole fired criticism and attacks while Clinton tried to “dodge” them. Dole attacked him on most of his ideas, and his tendency to exaggerate. Clinton avoided the lies he made since the 1992 presidential campaign (brought up by Dole, of course) by revealing all that he accomplished for the good of the people. Clinton focused on politics at a federal level at home, and tried to avoid foreign affairs. Dole based his debate on a state or local level. They both had separate ideas on different topics such as education, taxes, etc. They used these opposite ideas to attack each other.

The debates went smoothly through the first minutes without a lot of conflict but shortly into the debate Clinton makes his claim that “The United States is better off now than it was four years ago”. Dole attacks by saying “He s (Clinton) better off than he was four years ago”. Although it cracked a few laughs, it showed how little respect he has for Clinton and how desperate he is getting to resort to such cheesy remarks. The first several minutes of the debate had Clinton summarizing all that he has done in the past four years such as 10.5 million more jobs, the Brady Bill, and Family, Medical, and educational bills. In turn Dole complains that the United States has stagnant wages, and that 40% of wages are spent on taxes. On the topic of drug use in the United States Clinton claimed that cocaine use decreased 30% and crime decreased as well. Dole soon reacted by saying, rather sarcastically that drug abuse has doubled and for so much money that has been spent on crime little has changed. Throughout the debates Clinton claims he has done so much good for the country such as cutting the size of government, and stimulating economic growth. In return Dole would blame him for exaggerating and stealing credit for other s work such as governors, senators, etc. Clinton did little direct attacking but at one point, for example, he criticized Dole s 550 billion dollar “scheme” to cut Medicare and Social Security.

Clinton and Dole showed very different views on education. Clinton observed education as dependent on the federal government program for funding. Bob Dole believes that education should be brought more local, and on a state level. Dole wants to cut all federal programs and move programs such as Health Care, Medicare, etc., to more of a state level.

Bill Clinton likes to keep his ideas as well as debates on not only a federal level but within United States boundaries as well. He tries to avoid foreign affairs as that is an area of weakness. Bob Dole knows this and he attacks Clinton s policies. He claims that Clinton handled the situations incorrectly in places such as Haiti, Bosnia, Northern Ireland, North Korea, and Cuba. He says it has cost the United States billions of dollars to attempt to keep peace in the world. Clinton had no real answer to the remarks accept to give little positive outcomes of United States actions in these countries. He attacked Clinton s defense cuts as well. The President had claimed he would cut 60 billion dollars in defense spending, when in fact he cut 112 million dollars, according to Dole, but then again who knows.

Clinton and Dole possess very different outlines. Clinton believes in Federal power as Dole believes in state and local power. Clinton wants to decrease fire arms, reduce defense, and increase Welfare and Medicare. He plans to further stimulate education and his health plan. Dole on the other hand wants to increase defense spending, cut taxes on individuals but increase taxes on a national level, and take power from federal programs and pump it into state and local power. These are very different ideas which led to a lot of bickering and attacking of the issues (typical of any presidential debate). They both show completely different attitudes. To summarize the debate, it can be simply said that Dole attacked and avoided questions, while Clinton defended himself and directly addressed the people. For these reasons, Clinton clearly won this debate. Although he was not great he clearly won more respect from myself and many others. In all honesty, this was truly a g

Додати в блог або на сайт

Цей текст може містити помилки.

A Free essays | Essay
7.7кб. | download | скачати

Related works:
Presidential Debates
Presidential Debates
The Debates Of Their Lives
Debates Over Slavery
Debates On Tax Cuts
Debates 2000
LincolnDouglas Debates
Debates Over School Vouchers
© Усі права захищені
написати до нас