My Complaint About Plato The Athenian Essay, Research Paper
I’ve tried to keep quiet, but I just can’t hold it in any longer. I have to tell everyone that I will not bow to coercion, intimidation, or the threat of violence. But first, I’m going to jump ahead a bit and talk in general terms about how I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have had enough of Plato the Athenian’s waste, fraud, misfeasance, and malfeasance. Then, I’ll back up and fill in some of the details. Okay, so to start with the general stuff, some of the facts I’m about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, Plato intends to create a new social class. Gutless twisted-types, rotten swindlers, and depraved braggadocios will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their helots. I have the following to say to the assertion that violence and prejudice are funny: Baloney!
It has been said that we have a right and an obligation to focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what’s happening in the world. I believe that to be true. I also believe that the central paradox of his scare tactics, the twist that makes his claims so irresistible to irrational prigs, is that these people truly believe that this is the best of all possible worlds and that he is the best of all possible people. I am sorry to have to put this so bluntly, but Plato’s older epithets were antihumanist enough. His latest ones are undeniably beyond the pale. Plato gained ascendancy through monstrous abuse of his forces. While this lighthearted statement adds sorely needed humor to an otherwise tense situation, Plato says that his press releases are not worth getting outraged about. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.
I am being entirely serious when I say that if I didn’t think he would make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels, I wouldn’t say that honor means nothing to him. Principles mean nothing to him. All he cares about is how best to condone universal oppression. Plato’s stories about anti-intellectualism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept’s initial implausibility. A trip to your local library would reveal that Plato argues that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: When I say that I cannot believe that he would consider beer-guzzling liars and cheats as effete social outcasts, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that black is white and night is day. This is a common fallacy held by two-faced leeches. I could substantiate what I’m saying about infernal, satanic junkies, but I don’t feel that that’s necessary, since we all know what they’re like. Given that it’s deranged control freaks like Plato that beat plowshares into swords, isn’t it obvious that he is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does? The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. In short, Plato the Athenian is offended by anything that might suggest that his obiter dicta are clear testimony to the fact that what our nation needs is more respect for the law, not less.
Bibliography
http://www-csag.cs.uiuc.edu/individual/pakin/complaint?title=&firstname=Plato&middlename=&lastname=the+Athenian&suffix=&gender=m&shorttype=f&pgraphs=3