THE PHILOSOPHY OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
lessons are of value to any generation. This may be hard to see in
Nietzsche’s work; but, we are assured that it was appropriate thought for his time. However, even Nietzsche’s critics admit that his words hold an undeniable truth, as hard as it is to accept. Perhaps this is why his work is timeless, and has survived 150 years in print.
Christianity “God is Dead!” announced Zarathustra (better known
sickness; and to convince that highest achievements in human life depend on elimination of God. Whether God existed had no relevance in his goal. Proclamation of the death of God was a fundamental ingredient in the revaluation of values Nietzsche advocated.
– F. Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
government and an ideal God: the “Overman” or “Superman.” These Gods were a product of natural selection, or social Darwinism. He felt, very strongly, that any kind of moral limitations upon man would only stand in the way of The Overman.
“The Will To Power,” his strongest teaching, meant that The Overman should and would do anything possible to gain power, control and strength. If one showed the smallest bit of weakness or morality, he would be killed by the stronger Overman, and taken over. Thus, the
advancement of The Master Race (Nietzsche’s “Master Race” will
be discussed later).
“… his superman as the individual rising precariously out of the mire of mass mediocrity, and owing his existence more to deliberate breeding and careful nurture than to
the hazards of natural selection.”
Master Race Nietzsche is often referred to as a pre-Nazi thinker, by his idealism of The Master Race. He was, in fact, a prime influence on the writing of Hitler’s highest men, and quoted in Hitler’s speeches. But, his writings were mostly taken out of context, because he was very open about his distaste for “those anti-semites.” If one is able to
come from a more intelligent place, regarding the breeding of best-fit
humans, Nietzsche was far beyond Hitler. Nietzsche understood the
necessity for variation in a population, and especially was able to
appreciate the contributions of other races and cultures. His ideal
society would be a race that included select bits from many
races/cultures. The only culture that he seemed to have a special
appreciation for were the Polish. He wrote, “The Poles, I consider
the most gifted and gallant among Slavic people…” Still, he wrote
culture in Germany during his time:
“The whole problem of the Jews exists only in nation states,
for here their energy and higher intelligence, their accumulated capital of spirit and will, gathered from generation to generation though a long schooling in suffering, must become so preponderant as to arouse mass envy and hatred. In almost all contemporary nations, therefore — in direct proportion to the degree which they act up nationalistically — the literary obscenity of leading the Jews to slaughter as scapegoats of every conceivable public and internal misfortune is spreading. As soon as it is no longer a matter of preserving nations, but of producing the strongest possible Euro-Mixed race, the Jew is just as useful and desirable as ingredient as any other national remnant.”
cruelest animal,” he states in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In his book,
Beyond Good and Evil, he really aims at changing the reader’s opinion as to what is good and what is evil, but professes, except at moments, to be raising what is “evil” and decrying what is “good.” It is necessary for higher men to make war upon the masses, and resist the democratic tendencies of the age, for in all directions mediocre people are joining hands to make themselves masters. “Everything that
pampers, that softens, and that brings the ‘people’ or ‘woman’ to the
front, operates in favor of universal suffrage — that is to say, the
dominion of ‘inferior’ men.”
this point, I believe it’s important to note Nietzsche’s experience with women, because his writings about them seemed to begin closely after being rejected by the only woman he admitted to love. She rejected him as he asked her hand in marriage.
“Men shall be trained for war and woman for the recreation of
the warrior. All else is folly.”
“Thou goest to woman? Do not forget thy whip.”
From Nietzsche’s experience with women, as author Betrand Russell said, “Nine out of ten women would get the whip away from him, and he knew it, so he kept away from women, and soothed his wounded vanity with unkind remarks.” Many of his comments toward women reflected what a lonely and unloved person he was. In some poems he wrote after his prospective wife left him, he wrote this lonely line: “I could sing a song, and I will sing it, although I am alone in an empty house and must sing it to mine own ears.” So, he added appropriately to his beliefs the following:
When a man is in love he should not be permitted to make decisions
affecting his entire life. We should declare invalid the vows of lovers and should make love a legal impediment to marriage.”
The Aristocracy Nietzsche loved his aristocratic anarchism, and had such a hate for democracy, that it consumes nearly every bit of his philosophy. His ideal society was divided into three classes: producers (farmers, merchants, business men), officials (soldiers and government), and rulers. The latter would rule, but they would not officiate in government; the actual government is a menial task. The rulers would be philosopher-statesmen rather than office- holders. Their power will rest on the control of credit and the army; but they would live more like the proud-soldier than like the financier.
Nietzsche believed that some people were inherently more important than others; their happiness or unhappiness counted for more than the happiness of average people. He dismissed John Stuart Mill as a “blockhead” for the presupposition that everyone was equal. He wrote about Mill:
“I abhor the man’s vulgarity when he says “what is right
for one man is right for another. Such principals wild fain establish the whole of human traffic upon mutual services, so every action would appear to be a cash payment for something done to us. The hypothesis here is ignoble to the last degree; it is taken for granted that there is some sort of equivalence in value between my actions and thine.”
Nietzsche, as I said before, hated democracy, but he recognized
Christianity as a greater risk. Perhaps this was because people are
always more loyal to their god, than their government. He felt that
democracy began with Christianity: “…holy epileptics like saint
Paul, who had no honesty. The new testament is the gospel of a completely ignoble species of man. Christianity is the most fatal and seductive lie that ever existed.” So, before stripping people of their choice and equality, their God had to be taken first, then the government.
“Consequently, the road to the superman must lie through
aristocracy. Democracy – - this manner for counting noses — must be
eradicated before it is too late. The first step here is the destruction of Christianity so far as all higher men are concerned.”
Conclusion As Will Durant stated Nietzsche’s faults so eloquently,
“we can see him suffering at every line, and we must love him even
where we question him,” I couldn’t agree more. I always ask the
supremacist the question, “why do you support a supremacist
government that would probably reject you into it’s lower class?” I
have no doubt, that if Nietzsche lived in his ideal society, he would have no honor, as he misses every requirement, being a sickly man who was rejected from the army, and lacking the strength to compete with his own “superman.”