Federalists Vs Anti Federalists


Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay, Research Paper

Federalists vs Anti Federalists


The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists

When the revolutionary war was over, the American colonists had found

themselves free of British domination. Due to the fact that they were free

from British control, they wanted to create their own system of government where

tyranny would be practically diminished. Originally, the separate states were

connected by The Articles of Confederation. But this document gave the central

government no power of their own. Because of this, the states had many problems

in international politics since they had just found freedom and did not have the

respect of other countries. This caused a lot of thinking and it was decided that

a document needed to be created to strengthen the central government and at the same

time ensuring the safety of the states. So came to be the constitution. The

constitution brought about a division between the American people. These two groups

were the federalists, who believed that the constitution was good, and the anti-federalists

who thought that the constitution would not be able to protect the rights of the people.

These two groups had conflicting views but together, they both wanted the same thing.

The same thing was that America should be controlled by the people by the principles

of federalism.

Both groups, the federalist and anti-federalists recognized the fact that

power was being abused. They witnessed what had happened in the war and that their

had been negative effects of power and the result was very clear. British vocation had

made them very aware of the threat of corruption. Therefore, they wanted to make a

government that would ensure the duration of an just republic. The federalists exclaimed

that the constitution was the only way they could reach this goal of a just society.

As James Wilson had said, the constitution would not give all the power to the

legislature unless it was legally written down to ensure power was not mistreated. In the

constitution, it does allow congress to make laws that help out the government in the area of

execution of foreign powers.

The view of the anti-federalists were obviously different. They believed

that the power given to the congress was not safe since it put them too much in

control. Hence they created the Bill of Rights to “establish justice, ensure domestic

tranquillity and provide for the common defense…” The anti-federalists feared that the

actual people would not be fairly represented by their new government since they would have

the power to get rid of the individual rights of the people. The Bill of Rights claims

it is for and by the people. Especially since America is so large, it does not ensure

everyone’s opinion would be heard. Many people did not like the idea of having representatives

from each state because one man can not bring forth many different opinions. Anti-federalists

believe that liberty only is present when there are few people and they can actually

get their voice projected. In a large population, like America, the citizens do not get

individual freedom and are deprived of their rights.

Yet, Madison a federalist stated that in a small republic, tyranny could be

much more assessable since it would be easier to dominate others. Unlike in a

large republic which is made up of many views where as it is less chance that a few can

dominate others. Even in individual states it is easy to elect officials since people can be

easily controlled when there aren’t many people. In other word, the more the people, the less

chance of bribery and inducement. Another benefit of a larger republic is that there

would be a variety of people representing them and their would be many candidates to pick

from. Ensuring the highest quality government. In a small republic, options would

be very select making it an unfair election.

Besides finding officials to best represent the people, there were many other

controversial topics that faced the American people. The topic of taxation

brought about many different ideas of what should be. The anti-federalists believed that by

forming a new system would be very challenging because that is what they know and use.

The first problem they found was that states would not want to have two state taxes.

This is unfair to the people. They also argued that a state tax was unfair since each state

was different with different needs. This could very well destroy a state economically while

other states be fine.

The federalists believed that congress had all the right to have direct

taxation in ensure the safety of national security. The claimed that the constitution

was created to make sure the sovereign power of the states was protected. The state

legislature was responsible to elect two senators and the presidential electoral process.

As stated before, both sides wanted to create a country where the peoples

voice was heard and tyranny would not happen, but the way to accomplish this was a

conflicting. The topic of power and who got what had torn America apart but

soon enough, they formed a perfect solution in which both views where united to

protect the citizens rights.

Додати в блог або на сайт

Цей текст може містити помилки.

A Free essays | Essay
8.7кб. | download | скачати

Related works:
AntiFederalists Vs Federalists
Whigs V Federalists
Did The Federalists Believe In Democracy
The Federalists And The AntiFederalists
Federalists Vs Antifederalists
Federalists Party
Benefits Of Federalists
© Усі права захищені
написати до нас