Common Sense Control, Not Gun Control Essay, Research Paper
Common Sense Control, Not Gun Control
It’s late at night, and you’re home all alone. You double checked to make
sure all of the doors were locked and made sure all of the windows were closed.
It’s been a quiet night, but for some odd reason you cannot sleep. During your
restless night, you hear a bump in the kitchen. At first you dismiss it as the
wind. But there it is again, and it’s louder this time. You’re scared, your
pulse is racing and you cannot think of what to do. You don’t know whether to
call 911 or just lay there and hope whatever it was will go away. But then you
realize you have a 9-mm Smith and Wesson hand gun in the nightstand. You
quietly get it out, take off the trigger lock, and retrieve the bullets from on
top of your dresser. You don’t want to create a situation that isn’t necessary
so you huddle next to your bed and hope whomever it is takes what they want and
leaves. You hear them walking down the hallway toward you. Your bladder nearly
lets go. The intruder tries to open your door but luckily you locke d it.
There still is the possibility that it’s you spouse so you don’t shoot the
intruder through the door. Then the intruder kicks the door in, sending
splinters of wood flying about the room. The time has come, you raise from the
side of your bed, instinctively assuming a marksman’s pose and fire just as the
intruder is raising his weapon. He flies back against the wall and slumps into
a lifeless pile. You then proceed to call 911.
Now, that is not an uncommon scenario in the present state of society.
Now what I ask you to picture is that same scenario, but this time only the
intruder has a weapon because all guns have been outlawed and the criminal is
the only person who can get their hands on them. It’s a rather scary thought,
isn’t it. But that is exactly what some people want. They want a ban on all
firearms. But that is not the solution, the solution is the education of every
person that purchases a firearm and required trigger locks, and stricter
compliance by judges to the sentences mandated for crimes involving firearms.
The “most recent attempt at federal gun legislation was the Gun Control
Act of 1968″ (Goldwater 183) and has done little if anything to lower the number
of crimes committed using firearms. In fact, “the number of shooting homicides
per year has climbed steadily since it’s enactment, while armed robberies have
increased 60 percent.” (183). Now, this is a staggering piece of information.
But it’s just one piece of evidence that shows that gun control laws are only
marginally effective, if at all, in curtailing crimes involving firearms.
Now, I am not saying that there should be absolutely no restrictions on
who has a fire arm, because that is not true. “Most everyone will agree that
felons, addicts, morons, juveniles, alcoholics, the mentally incompetent and
others in whose hands even an ice pick or baseball bat becomes a deadly weapon,
should be denied guns.”(Selib 202). But banning all hand guns is not the way to
go about lowering the rate of crimes involving hand guns. As an example:
. . . in the decade from 1960 to 1970, gun crimes in England
increased some 750 percent – this in a country where there aren’t supposed to be
any pistols in private hands. What is demonstrated forcefully in England is
that in a place where guns are outlawed, only outlaws have guns. (202)
As I have pointed out, gun control legislation has only a marginal
effect. I think that more headway in lowering handgun related crimes could be
made through education. This exact point is made by Barry Goldwater:
Gun education, in fact, can actually reduce lawlessness in a
community, as was demonstrated in an experiment conducted in Highland Park
Michigan. City police launched a program to instruct merchants in the use of
handguns. The idea was to help them protect themselves and their businesses
from robbers, and it was given wide publicity. The store-robbery rate dropped
from an average of 1.5 a day to none in four months. (186)
There is one other way of dropping the crime rate involving firearms,
this is through stricter laws in respect to crimes that involve a firearm. “A
study . . . revealed that in New York City, which has about the most prohibitive
gun legislation in the country, only one out of six people convicted of crimes
involving weapons went to jail.” (Goldwater 186). Statistics like this arise
“because too many judges and magistrates either don’t know the law or are
unwilling to apply it with appropriate vigor.” (186) The NRA has in the past,
and are presently, supporting measures to increase the severity of the
punishments of the “incorrigible minority who place themselves outside of the
law.” (Cassidy 238). And “As a result [of such support] . . . violent crimes
with firearms, like assault and robbery, have stabilized or are actually
declining.” (238) It’s been proven in the past the “levels of firearm ownership
cannot be associated with the levels of criminal violence. . . . On the other
hand, tough laws designed to incarcerate violent offenders offer something gun
control cannot: swift, sure justice . . . with no accompanying erosion of
individual liberty.” (238).
And for those of you out there who are not only concerned with the
crimes committed with hand guns, but with the deaths due to accessibility of
hand guns in the home, there is a solution. Most children will only play with a
gun if they can find it and figure out how to use it or make it do something.
Well, with a trigger lock on it, which will prevent it from doing anything and
therefore make it uninteresting. And if the gun is kept in a safe spot, then it
will no longer be accessible at all. Some people argue that crimes of passion
happen mainly due the availability of hand guns, but “if a person is angry
enough to kill, he will kill with the first thing that comes to hand — a gun, a
knife, an ice pick, a baseball bat.” (Goldwater 184) A trigger lock will also
help to prevent the use of guns in crimes of passion, delaying, if not stopping,
the person from using the gun. These might sound like simple solutions to a
difficult solution, but they are solutions that will work.
Nan Desuka put it best, “‘Guns don’t kill people – criminals do.’
That’s a powerful slogan, much more powerful than it’s alternate version, ‘Guns
don’t kill people – people kill people.’” And I think that this is true. It
has been proven repeatedly that gun control laws and bans on some types of
firearms just do not work well enough. It’s time that we stop trying to keep
guns out of the hands of criminals by taking guns out of the hands of law-
abiding citizens. It’s time to start educating each gun owner on how to safely
use and keep their weapon. That, along with tougher penalties for those using
guns during crimes, will lower the crime rates involving guns and the deaths
related to guns.
Works Cited
Cassidy, J. Warren. “The Case for Firearms.” Current Issues and Enduring
Questions Boston: Bedford, 1993.
Desuka, Nan. “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed.” Current Issues and Enduring
Questions Boston: Bedford, 1993.
Goldwater, Barry. “Why Gun Control Laws Don’t Work.” Reader’s Digest Dec. 1975:
183-188
Selib, Henry A. “The Case Against More Laws.” Current Issues and Enduring
Questions Boston: Bedford, 1993.