Stories of the Flood
Prof. J. P. Atherton
October 29, 1997
some of these differing aspects are for the most part, fairly trivial, some of them are quite drastic
from one version to the other.
The source of the myth in the two cultures is quite different, as well as the way the story
narrated. In the case of the ancient Mesopotamian version of the myth, it is found in The Epic of
Gilgamesh. It is told to Gilgamesh by Utnapishtim when Gilgamesh encounters him while on his
quest for the plant of everlasting life. Here we have a first hand account of the flood, by one of the
This is quite from the ancient Hebrew account of the flood. In the Old Testament, it is
second hand account of the story, found in what is considered to be a sacred piece of scripture, as
written by one of the most important figures of the religion.
both myths. In the Mesopotamian version of the story, man was becoming an inconvenience for
man was causing this disruption, Enlil approaches the other gods and they agree to get rid of man
This is an extreme contrast to what is found in the Hebrew version. In that account, man
he should be wiped off the earth. In this case, man was not an inconvenience, he was just not in
favour with God. Noah was the only one out of all of man who was still in God?s favour. So God
came to Noah and told him to also build a barque, also with the exact dimensions given, and
instructed Noah to bring on board his family, their families, and two, a male and female, of all the
animals of the world.
him being permitted to bring with him any other humans besides his immediate family, and their
wives. Also, the amount of detail regarding the dimensions of the barque is quite different. In the
Biblical story, the dimensions are very explicit, with length, width, and height given. However, in
the Mesopotamian story, the dimensions are not as precise, giving only a rough guide as to what
the boat should look like.
The final warning before the flood is different in each version also. In the Hebrew account
of the flood, once Noah has completed the construction of the Ark, God tells him to go out and
collect a male and it?s mate from every type of animal and bird, and that in seven days, he shall
bring forth the floodwaters and destroy man. In the Mesopotamian version of this aspect, there is
not as much of an advanced warning given. Shamash comes to Utnapishtim and says that when
both stories, the hero is given some advanced warning as to when the flood will begin, in the
enjoy to get everything loaded aboard.
The duration of the flood is different between the two versions also. In the Mesopotamian
account, the flood is said to have began in the morning after the arrival of the Rider of the Storm,
Underworld was enlisted to help bring down the dykes and release the waters of the flood.
Utnapishtim says to Gilgamesh that the flood was so dreadful that even the gods of the heavens
were in fear of what the gods of the Underworld were doing, and that they retreated to the
highest level of the heavens, that occupied by Anu.
forty nights, not the single week as was stated in the Mesopotamian account. It was also God?s
wrath that man was suffering, and the creatures of the Underworld were in no way involved in
this destruction of man, as man had brought this upon himself with his own wickedness.
water grew calm. Utnapishtim looked around for land, and saw the summit of the Mountain of
Nisir. Utnapishtim then set the boat aground on the top of the mountain and there it sat for a
week before Utnapishtim began to see if the earth had dried off yet. First he let a dove loose to
a swallow loose, but to no avail, as it too returned. He then let a raven loose. The raven saw that
the water had since retreated, found something to eat, flew around, cawed, and then did not
In the Hebrew story, Noah first set out a raven, which flew around until the waters had
dried up. Noah then let a dove loose, but it returned because it had nowhere to land. Noah then
waited seven days to release the dove again. This time it came back with an olive leaf. Noah
waited seven more days, and released the dove a third time. This time it did not return, for it had
found somewhere to go as the water had since dried up. The only noticeable difference between
these two aspects of the story, would be the birds used and the length of time required for the
waters of the flood to recede to a point at which man is able to again walk on dry land.
The last point regarding the two stories is that of the sacrifice to God or the gods after the
floodwaters had retreated to a point that man was able to return to the land. In the Mesopotamian
account of the myth, Utnapishtim made a sacrifice to the gods on top of the Mountain of Nisir,
after he let the animals and others free from the barque. All the gods were able to smell the
sacrifice, and came to it. Ishtar was also able to smell the sacrifice and came to it. She then says
that she will not forget these days of the flood, and instructed the other gods to remember it also.
She then told all the gods except Enlil to gather around it. Enlil was excluded from the sacrifice by
Ishtar because he brought about the flood and destroyed man. Enlil, however, came and saw the
sacrifice, and was filled with anger that man had survived. Ea then stands up to Enlil on behalf of
Utnapishtim, and asks how Enlil could have brought about such destruction on to man. Ea then
leaves Utnapishtim to the mercy of Enlil. Enlil takes Utnapishtim and his wife, blesses them,
giving them longevity and places them at the mouth of the rivers to live.
In the Hebrew version of this last aspect of the story of the flood, Noah lets all the animals
off of the Ark, and then he makes a sacrifice to God, just as Utnapishtim did. God smelled this
sacrifice and came to it. God blessed Noah, his family, and all the animals and birds, and told them
to be fruitful and multiply in number. God then established a covenant with Noah, saying that he
shall never again curse the earth again with such a flood. As a sign of his intentions, God set a
rainbow in the clouds, and said to Noah that when ever he brings clouds over the earth again, he
will see the rainbow and remember his covenant with Noah. This is not much different from the
Mesopotamian myth. In both cases the gods or God said that they would remember the flood, and
Utnapishtim or Noah, which ever the case may be was blessed. In the Mesopotamian myth
however, there is no mention of a covenant with the land or Utnapishtim to never curse the earth
in such a manner again.
Though both of these stories are telling a tale of what was no doubt, the same event, there
are many discrepancies between the two. From details surrounding the structure of the barque, to
the actual length of the flood itself, there are many differences between the two accounts. At the
same time however, there are many similarities between the myths. The fact that both said that a
receded, and the fact that both tales say that the gods or God would remember the flood are
examples of this. The truth of the matter is that, regardless of whether or not there are
discrepancies between the two tales, the fact that both are describing the same occurance is truly
remarkable and definitely says something about the cataclysmic impact which this event must have
had on the ancient world.