Brutus’ Tragic Flaw Essay, Research Paper
Brutus?s Tragic Flaw
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is mainly based on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The character who was in charge of the assassination was ironically, Marcus Brutus, a servant and close friend to Julius Caesar. But what tragic flaw would cause a person to kill a close friend? After examining Brutus’ relationship to Caesar, his involvement in the conspiracy, and his importance to the plot, the truth can be revealed.
Brutus, a servant and close friend to Caesar, has a strong relationship with Caesar but a stronger relationship with Rome and its people. His tragic flaw is that he thinks the people of Rome want him to be a leader. He says to the people that, “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Brutus is very close to Caesar. In many points of the play, Brutus was next to Caesar. Brutus also loves Caesar but fears his power. In the early acts of the play, Brutus tells Cassius he fears Caesar is going to be king. Brutus loves Caesar, but would not allow him to become king. Brutus would not allow Caesar to rise to power and then turn his back onto the people of Rome. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Brutus talks to Antony about Caesar’s death. Brutus says that Antony cannot see their hearts, which are full of pity. Again, this shows how Brutus loved Caesar but cared for the life of Rome and its people more. This is the only reason Brutus would conspire against Caesar. For Brutus says to himself, “I know no personal cause to spurn at him…How that might change his nature…” Caesar’s relationship with Brutus is also strong. Just allowing Brutus to speak to Caesar shows his respect for Brutus. Caesar feels that Brutus is noble to him and does the right thing regardless of personal danger. On the Ides of March, as Caesar was assassinated, Caesar’s last line is: “Et tu, Brute? –Then fall, Caesar.” This again shows how much Caesar respects Brutus. Brutus and Caesar both respect each other, but in different ways.
Marcus Brutus had a very important role in the conspiracy against Caesar. He was the “back-bone” of the plan. As Cinna says, ?If we could but win the noble Brutus to our party?? According to Cassius, Brutus’ main purpose in the conspiracy is for an ?insurance policy?. The people will think, since Brutus is noble to Caesar, that there is a good reason for Caesar’s assassination. Brutus will also be the leader of the conspiracy for another “insurance policy” for the assassination. Again, if Brutus leads the way, the people will think that the death of Julius Caesar wasn’t such a bad thing. Brutus also declares to himself that his role in the conspiracy is to save Rome.
If Brutus were not in the plot of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the conspiracy would probably not have worked. Since Brutus “…loved Rome more.” he decided to be a part of the conspiracy. If he hadn’t loved Rome more than Caesar, he would not have joined in the assassination of Julius Caesar. Cassius and the rest of the conspirators would probably not have continued on without Brutus because they would have no “insurance” afterwards. The people would think that there was no reason for Caesar’s death and most likely beheaded all the conspirators. Also, if Brutus were not in the play, the whole end of the play would not ever occur. Brutus would not be there to have an army or kill himself, and Cassius will already be beheaded. If Brutus were not in the play, the title would have absolutely no meaning.
Marcus Brutus was a good friend to Julius Caesar, but not good enough. He had moral values dealing with Rome and its people. Brutus’ values then made him join a conspiracy against Caesar put together by Cassius. Brutus joined this mainly because he didn’t want Caesar to turn his back on Rome so there would be a reasonable reason for killing Caesar. If Brutus weren?t in the play, there would be no “Tragedy” in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.